Freedom of faith, conscience and speech

Contact lawmakers  •  Track bills  •  Report discrimination
Tell Congress: Support Marriage and Religious Freedom Act


Fight discrimination

Help for professionals who have experienced discrimination.

Read More




Media Contact Form

Follow and share Freedom2Care at our blog and on Twitter twitterand Facebook Facebook

Newspapers collage F2C in the News Tsai Ali videoCMA videos    Press Conference - Conway Poll results

Press coverage and commentaries: Freedom2Care In the News

Videos in the news

White House: More changes to contraception mandate coming

Washington Times

July 23, 2014

"If the government just kept us out of the process altogether of either triggering, authorizing, or in any fashion being the gateway for employees to receive coverage for objectionable practices, that would satisfy our concerns," said the Rev. Frank Pavone, national director of Priests for Life, a nonprofit, pro-life organization.

Read More

Filed under: LawsuitsContraceptionPriests for Life

Symposium on Whether Legalization of Same-Sex Marriage Is Constitutionally Required

BYU Law Review article by Robert Destro, et. al.

July 22, 2014

The Equal Protection Clause does not authorize the judiciary to substitute its own value judgments for those of Congress and the People of the states unless the Constitution itself confers the contested status. This Article concludes by arguing that the federal government has no authority to deconstruct the moral culture of any community. The Constitution expressly prohibits any attempt to require an individual or institutional dissenter to affirm, expressly or implicitly, abhorrent moral or religious views or behaviors.

Read More

Filed under: LawsuitsReligious freedomMarriage

Hobby Lobby and Conestoga: A Victory for Religious Freedom

Washington Insider commentary by Richard Doerflinger

July 22, 2014

The Court’s 5-to-4 decision in favor of the religious freedom of these familyowned companies was immediately greeted by a hailstorm of negative, misleading, and ignorant commentary by those who are politically committed to mandatory contraceptive coverage for all Americans. However, what the court did, in fact, was follow its own precedents and faithfully apply a law passed almost unanimously by the people’s elected representatives. That law is the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), which was approved by the 103rd Congress almost unanimously in 1993 and signed into law by President Bill Clinton. RFRA says that a federal policy cannot “substantially burden” a person’s religious freedom unless it furthers a “compelling governmental interest” in the way that is “least restrictive” of that freedom.

Read More

Filed under: LawsuitsCommentariesU.S. Conf. Catholic Bishops

USCCB chairmen respond to unprecedented and extreme executive order

USCCB news release

July 21, 2014

The bishop-Chairmen of two USCCB Committees responded with great concern to President Obama's July 21 executive order to prohibit federal government contractors from what the Administration deems "sexual orientation" and "gender identity" discrimination and to forbid "gender identity" discrimination in the employment of federal employees. The problems the bishops identify in the order relate both to the flaws in its core prohibitions, and to its lack of religious freedom protection.

Read More

Filed under: CommentariesU.S. Conf. Catholic BishopsHomosexuality

Response to Obama's LGBT Executive Order

National Review Online commentary by Ryan Anderson

July 21, 2014

In response to this executive order, Congress has an opportunity to protect religious liberty and the rights of conscience. Policy should prohibit the government from discriminating against any individual or group, whether nonprofit or for-profit, based on their beliefs that marriage is the union of a man and woman or that sexual relations are reserved for marriage. The government should be prohibited from discriminating against such groups or individuals in tax policy, employment, licensing, accreditation, or contracting. This is the policy approach proposed by the Marriage and Religious Freedom Act (H.R. 3133, S. 1808).

Read More

Filed under: CommentariesHeritage FoundationHomosexuality

Becket Fund law firm gaining a reputation as powerhouse after Hobby Lobby win

Washington Post

July 20, 2014

With just a dozen full-time attorneys, the firm, after a string of Supreme Court successes, is earning a reputation in legal circles as a powerhouse, though its leaders play down talk about the firm's growing influence. "We had a good laugh," said Kristina Arriaga, the firm's executive director, when asked about the nationwide attention that followed the Supreme Court's June 30 Hobby Lobby ruling. "We find there has been an aggressive push from the government to become the sole arbiter of morality, which is not good for the country," Arriaga said. "Regrettably, religious liberty work has augmented exponentially."

Read More

Filed under: LawsuitsReligious freedomBecket Fund

U.S. Senate Democrats Take Aim at Conscience Protections

National Right to Life News Today

July 17, 2014

U.S. Senate Democrats yesterday sought to advance the so-called "Protect Women's Health From Corporate Interference Act" (S. 2578), a sweeping bill that, if enacted, would further empower the Obama Administration to mandate coverage of the abortion pill RU-486, surgical abortion (including late abortions), or anything else it chooses to classify as "preventive services," overriding all existing federal laws that protect religious freedom and conscience rights. "All Americans should rightly be concerned that every Senate Democrat supported a bill to trample on our rights of conscience," said Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life.

Read More

Filed under: AbortionCommentariesConscience rights

Senate Considering Bill That Could Wipe Out Many State Pro-Life Laws

Daily Signal commentary by Sarah Torre

July 16, 2014

"Imagine the vast majority of pro-life laws wiped out with the enactment of a single piece of federal legislation. That is the purpose behind S. 1696," summarizes Bill Saunders of Americans United for Life. The misleadingly named "Women's Health Protection Act," S. 1696, sponsored by Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., would do just the opposite of its euphemistic title. Effectively, it would strip states of the ability to protect the health and safety of women and defend the lives of unborn children.

Read More

Filed under: AbortionHeritage FoundationLegislation

Sens. Ayotte, Fischer: Stop Distorting Hobby Lobby Decision


July 16, 2014

Nothing in the Supreme Court's Hobby Lobby ruling denies a woman access to birth control, and attempts to misrepresent the facts of the case and its impact on women are divisive and damaging, say New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte and Nebraska Sen. Deb Fischer. "In the days since the Supreme Court's June 30 Burwell v. Hobby Lobby decision, we have been troubled by those who seem eager to misrepresent both the facts of the case and the impact of its ruling on women - all to divide Americans and score political points in a tough election year," the women wrote.

Read More

Filed under: CommentariesCongressContraception

Senator Blunt Debunks Democrats' False Claims Regarding Hobby Lobby Supreme Court Ruling

YouTube video

July 16, 2014

U.S. Senator Roy Blunt (Mo.) spoke on the U.S. Senate floor today to debunk false claims made by Senate Democrats regarding the Burwell v. Hobby Lobby U.S. Supreme Court ruling, which found that the Obama Administration infringed on Americans' First Amendment right to freedom of religion. Watch video.

Read More

Filed under: Religious freedomCongressContraception

Copyright 2014 Freedom2Care. All Rights Reserved. eResources